Formal Review of std.process
Johannes Pfau
nospam at example.com
Mon Apr 8 01:18:28 PDT 2013
Am Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:52:11 +0200
schrieb "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public at kyllingen.net>:
> On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 05:54:39 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
> wrote:
> > The following is a message posted by Johannes Pfau to the other
> > (pre-)review thread which didn't seem to get noticed, along
> > with an edited version of my reply.
> >
> > On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 13:14:52 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> >>
> >> Reposted from github:
> >> I think it would be nice if the high level functions would
> >> also allow
> >> using custom environment variables. So the execute and
> >> executeShell
> >> functions should have overloads which accept a string[string]
> >> with
> >> environment variables (and probably accept a Config as well).
> >>
> >> The execute and executeShell functions would be trivial to
> >> implement
> >> though if pipeProcess / pipeShell had an overload with
> >> environment
> >> and Config parameters. So it's probably more important that
> >> pipeProcess / pipeShell get these overloads.
>
> I have implemented this now. I think this was a great
> improvement. pipeProcess(/-Shell) and execute(Shell) now wield
> more of the power of spawnProcess(/-Shell) without complicating
> their usage.
>
> Please comment.
>
> Lars
Thanks!
Looks good to me :-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list