Formal Review of std.process

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-08 11:17, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:

> Because there are symbols with those names defined in both std.stdio and
> core.stdc.stdio, and I got naming conflicts all over the place.  This
> was a while ago, though, and the compiler may have seen improvements in
> this area since then.  I'll try it out later.

I would say that something's wrong if one needs to come up with special 
naming schemes for function arguments.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg