Opportunity

[Paulo Pinto]

Am 08.04.2013 23:05, schrieb GoSucksButt:
> On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 14:22:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> <<Originally sent to wrong list, sorry if this appears a cross-posting.>>
>>
>> Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 2013, I've
>> decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better tools for any
>> native coding problem than C++.
>>
>>     pigeon[500] pigeons;
>>     pigeons[random(500)] = new cat;
>>
>> :-)
>
>   Go better than C++ for Games ?  Keeep dreaming buddy!

Not all games need to be the next Crysis.

>
> I like D but half of what makes a language useful are tools/IDE's etc,
> and D is just not comparable to C++ yet on this front.

If that was a major issue then what to say about C++ tooling when 
compared to what Delphi/Java/C# offer.

--
Paulo