Opportunity

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 21:51:11 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Am 08.04.2013 18:11, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
>> On 4/8/13 10:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
>>> <<Originally sent to wrong list, sorry if this appears a 
>>> cross-posting.>>
>>>
>>> Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 
>>> 2013, I've
>>> decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better 
>>> tools for any
>>> native coding problem than C++.
>>>
>>>    pigeon[500] pigeons;
>>>    pigeons[random(500)] = new cat;
>>>
>>> :-)
>>
>> This is great. Let us know how we can support you.
>>
>> It would be interesting to hear how your argument for Go 
>> addresses its
>> tenuous interface with C, pervasive indirect calls, and 
>> compulsive use
>> of GC.
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Lets not forget the lack of generics, the religious view 
> against dynamic linking and errors for unused variables and 
> imports.

The error for unrecheable statement is really of the same kind.