Sooo, umm, status of Optlink Issue #6144?

[Denis Shelomovskij]

10.04.2013 2:20, Walter Bright пишет:
> On 4/9/2013 2:41 PM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
>> But I have to say I see the only one reason for it here. It is "Wow,
>> that nasty
>> person who used to insult everybody just did something useful. Lets
>> say "Thanks"
>> hoping he will like it and begin being useful".
>
> You've been doing valuable stuff all along. It's why we put up with you :-)
>
> I would, however, prefer that when you fire a broadside that you direct
> it at me rather than others here.
>
>> So I'd like, if you don't mind, to redirect the "Thanks" to the
>> (really time
>> wasting and useful in a context of recent "shared library" talks and
>> changes)
>> fact I fixed TLS loading on Windows XP (yes, just finished what Rainer
>> started)
>> thus allowing languages like D to load/unload DLL-s dynamically.
>
> This is great news. Can you point me to the pull req on that?
>

No pulls, it isn't a part of druntime. It can be but only in the case 
executable is compiled. For D DLL it have to be loaded before the DLL 
and must not be unloaded until process termination.

NG post:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kf877d$iqd$1@digitalmars.com

NG post notes:
* replace `snn.dll` with `snn.lib`
* according the injector, regressions are easily fought but Issue 9044 
prevented it from being able to build

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij