Disable GC entirely

[Manu]

On 10 April 2013 19:22, Dicebot <m.strashun at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 09:15:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
>> Well there's always the standing question though, why is JVM and C# so
>> much
>> faster than D?
>> They produce a squillion times more garbage than D, yet they're much much
>> faster. I have come to accept the C# GC in less-intensive realtime
>> software, it's not so bad.
>>
>
> Erm, because they are not faster? I have performance tested vibe.d
> recently vs some similar solutions, including Java and C#. Vibe.d compiled
> with dmd. Destroyed both JVM and C# in raw performance and had same roughly
> latency (GC collections cycles, gah!).
>
> And Erlang won all of them in terms of latency on powerful machine.
>

How much garbage were you collecting? How long were the collect times? Did
you see the same relationship between the volume of garbage in JVM, C# and
D?
What was the performance relationship with respect to garbage volume? was
it linear?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130410/96b40507/attachment.html>