DIP 36: Rvalue References

[Namespace]

On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:37:43 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:36:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 17:06:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36
>>
>> I see no point in adding that much complexity for something 
>> that can mostly be automated.
>
> Can you explain this a bit more extensively, probably with some 
> sort of counter-proposal? I can't see where complexity comes 
> from, this DIP introduces literally zero special cases.

I think he means that the Compiler could/should decide, if 
something should passed by ref or by value. But I think that 
would be far more complex than scope ref/in ref.