Opportunity

[Timon Gehr]

On 04/10/2013 05:55 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 05:57 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 4/9/2013 1:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
>>> I have yet to find anyone who can tell me why Go must have generics with
>>> a cogent argument that makes sense to me.
>>
>> ....
>> What this means is the compiler (and language) needs NO KNOWLEDGE of
>> what the GC needs. The library implementer is free to innovate whatever
>> kind of tables are necessary. It means that radically different GCs can
>> be built and swapped in and out without change to the compiler or
>> language. It means that anyone who wants to build a better GC can do so
>> without forking the compiler.
>
> What about precise tracking of stack references?

/stack references/references on the stack/s