Disable GC entirely
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Wed Apr 10 11:47:01 PDT 2013
On 4/10/13 2:26 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 4/10/13, Andrei Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>> On 4/10/13 1:33 PM, Manu wrote:
>>> It may as well be a mistake that nonvirtual functions are at all
>>> part of a class' methods. This has been quite painfully seen in C++
>>> leading to surprising conclusions: http://goo.gl/dqZrr.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, some interesting points. Although I don't think I buy what he's
>>> selling.
>>
>> That article ain't sellin'. It's destroyin'.
>
> UFCS can't be the penultimate solution, for example:
>
> class S(T)
> {
> alias Type = SomeTypeModifier!T;
>
> static if (isSomePredicate!Type)
> {
> int x;
> void foo() { /* do something with x */ }
> }
> else
> {
> float y;
> void bar() { /* do something with y */ }
> }
> }
>
> How do you implement this with UFCS? It wouldn't look nice if you had
> to put those methods outside, while keeping the data inside. You'd
> have to duplicate static ifs outside and inside the class.
Agreed.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list