Vote for std.process

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 07:53:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
> Honestly, any new module could have appeared for approval at 
> this
> particular moment and I would have made the same criticisms.

Observation: this move wasn't something I would encourage. Jesse, 
the review manager for std.process, has specifically asked:

> Please place any further comments in the official review thread 
> leaving only your vote and a short comment (there should be no 
> need to reply to anyone).

There was ample time to discuss std.process during the informal 
and formal review. However, the situation with your replies is 
even worse: they don't even concern std.process in particular. 
Please consider starting a new thread next time, and stating your 
criticism aside to whatever poor module comes up the review queue 
;)