Was: Re: Vote for std.process

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 12:43:57 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 12:30:09 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad 
> wrote:
>> Finally, an example from the new std.process which got some 
>> heavy criticism in the other thread:
>>
>>    envz[pos++] = (var~'='~val~'\0').ptr;
>>
>> I have been operating under the assumption that the compiler 
>> is smart enough to make the above a single allocation.  If it 
>> isn't, I would consider it a compiler issue.
>
> Multiple chained array concatenations are performed at once, 
> using the _d_arraycatnT function in Druntime.

Good to know.

Lars