Allocatoin policy in Phobos - Was: Vote for std.process

[Manu]

On 12 April 2013 23:09, Lars T. Kyllingstad <public at kyllingen.net> wrote:

> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 13:00:36 UTC, Robert wrote:
>
>> I would suggest, instead of writing your own std.process, that you
>> simply provide a pull request to the now to be approved one, this way
>> you can prove your point that it is easy by already improving a part of
>> the standard library.
>>
>
> Actually, Manu (or anyone) could do this for *any* part of Phobos.  And
> considering that std.process is probably the module that would benefit the
> least from it, maybe he should start somewhere else?  std.string, perhaps,
> or std.algorithm?
>

I think I'll have a go at this after dconf. For now, I need to stop
distracting myself from my lecture preparation! ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130412/6bb98166/attachment.html>