'exp' vs 'std'? Forked: Vote for std.process

[Manu]

On 13 April 2013 02:07, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:27:11 -0400, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  I maintain the position that it needs at least a year in the real world
>> before you can truly be confident in it. New things shouldn't be barred
>> from post-release tuning on account of "omg it's a breaking change!".
>>
>
> I hate the 'omg it's a breaking change!' mentality as well.  This is an
> UNRELEASED product.
>
> I also hate the idea of creating another javax.
>

I don't understand this problem? Why is there a problem moving it when it's
ready?
It's already understood to be experimental, and the user has already
accepted the contract that changes can be made (including moving it to std).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130413/deba683a/attachment.html>