'exp' vs 'std'? Forked: Vote for std.process

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:15:33 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic  
<andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/12/13, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:16:09 -0400, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 17:27:58 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>> 1. Add std.exp.module with the API as it will be WITHOUT warnings
>>>
>>> exp.module?
>>
>> Right.
>
> I'd rather we keep it under "std" to avoiding stealing a name that an
> external library might already use (it's not stealing per se but it
> might introduce conflicts).

I'd like to take this opportunity to say I don't care what the name is :)   
That wasn't any part of my suggestion.  Whatever was decided as the "place  
to put experimental modules" is what I meant.

-Steve