Is there any plans to make working signals in D?

Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin.reg at gmail.com
Sun Apr 14 00:06:07 PDT 2013


For "working signals" I suppose will be enough fixing of both Issue 9606 
[1] and Issue 9603 [2].

IMO, for the first issue we need weak references [3].
IMO, for the second issue we need to make regular D objects on closures 
[4] and fix Issue 9602 [5].

Any thoughts about my proposal to make signals working in D? Other 
proposals? Any (approximate) period for [proposal parts] to be implemented?

Also, does anybody think currently D has working signals and I'm just 
slander in the title?

P.S.
Also there is a proposal for new signals implementation without compiler 
changes [6].


[1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9606
[2] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9603
[3] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4151
[4] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9601
[5] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9602
[6] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list