DIP35: Really: Re: DIP36
Robert
jfanatiker at gmx.at
Wed Apr 17 07:22:40 PDT 2013
Ooops, I meant I just read DIP36. Sorry for that, wrong thread.
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 15:49 +0200, Robert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just read DIP35, sounds good as far as I can tell. What I missed, is
> overloading rules, what function would be chosen if you have overloads
> that take per value/auto ref/ref/scope ref/in ref for lvalues,
> rvalues, ...
>
> Best regards,
> Robert
>
>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list