DIP 36: Rvalue References

[Namespace]

> Sadly, I have to agree on this. As nice as many new feature 
> ideas are, they are far from priorities when there are multiple 
> core mechanics that are broken.

There is no reason to prioritize DIP 36. Kenji, Dicebot and I did 
most of the work. The DIP is written and all necessary 
information are described in detail there with examples. The code 
also exists and there is even a pull request which has passed all 
the tests. Thus, this proposal is linked with not much work. Most 
of it was taken over by others.
Due to this, it really is not asking too much to get a note if 
this pull is accepted or rejected. Of course, with detailed 
justification.