Stable D version?

[Mehrdad]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 04:37:12 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 04:33:50 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
>> Yeah, hence it's broken.
>
> Um... I don't see the problem. Do you expect the compiler to 
> treat strings/arrays special and look up the equal method in 
> the standard library? Wouldn't that confuse you when it doesn't 
> apply to your structures? Furthermore, requiring the compiler 
> to know about the standard library doesn't sound broken to you?



It has nothing to do with the standard library.
It should do whatever operator == does.