Stable D version?

[Mehrdad]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 04:44:52 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
> 2013/4/23 Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com>
>
>> On Monday, 22 April 2013 at 23:35:56 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
>>
>>> I started a project a month ago, and for the moment my 
>>> feeling is just:
>>> D can already be used as it.
>>>
>>
>> Input:
>>         import std.stdio;
>>         struct S { string a; }
>>         pragma(msg,           S("x") == S("x".idup));
>>         void main() { writeln(S("x") == S("x".idup)); }
>>
>> Output:
>>         true
>>         false
>>
>> Nope, still broken.
>>
>
> This is mostly expected behavior. During compilation value 
> identities are
> not guaranteed.
> Because compile time evaluation is always done after constant 
> folding, and
> constant folding would fold "x".idup to "x", then S("x") == 
> S("x") is
> evaluated to true.
>
> Kenji Hara



I'm not saying the 'true' is broken, I'm saying the 'false' is 
broken.


And don't miss this one, which contradicts the behavior above
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/uqkslzjnosrsnyqnhzes@forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-zdmtaeycpomrhjdeanlw:40forum.dlang.org