Stable D version?

[anonymous]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 05:16:35 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
> Actually, I'm going to strengthen this a bit more. I'd _still_ 
> think it's a good idea to keep structs the way they are. I 
> expect (as I think many would) structs to be very bare metal. 
> Very little auto-magic should touch them because they are used 
> so often for low-level tasks and you really ought to be very 
> precise when you're defining them and their behavior. In that 
> context, "==" being the same as "is" makes sense from my 
> perspective and I wouldn't expect anything else unless I 
> explicitly told it otherwise.

I don't feel strongly about which path is right. But (as Mehrdad 
has shown) the current behaviour is not consistent either way: 
strings are compared bitwise, floats are compared logically.