Stable D version?

[Mehrdad]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 06:41:36 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 06:24:24 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
>>
>> The trouble is that you've already failed before you started.
>
> Also, I'm assuming that this means that you had no intention of 
> learning.

I could tell you the same thing, but it wouldn't get me anywhere.


> All I'm saying is that structs are really basic for a reason. 
> They're something you _build_ on.

Then they shouldn't define a behavior for == in the first place.


No behavior is better than wrong behavior.