Stable D version?

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Tue Apr 23 01:14:41 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 07:52:20 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 07:50:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> I have raised this topic several times already. Stable version 
>> that is guaranteed to never break user code
>
>
> So what happens when a flaw in the language is fixed?
>
> Do you fix it and break code, or do you leave it broken?

Well we have 2.062 . Let's decide this is stable version.

2.062.1 will go out then 2.062.2, etc . . . They contains only 
fixes with really small (I mean almost non existent) breakage, no 
new feature, only fix of ICE, codegen bugs, etc . . .

And 2.063 can still be pushed in the meantime. The thing that 
with D, you hit compiler bugs and so on, and you can't get fixes 
without getting the new version that break half of your code.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list