Stable D version?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 4/23/13 2:42 PM, eles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 14:26:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I think we shouldn't follow the C++ model. Whatever made C++
>> successful is not what'll make D successful. The context and
>> expectations are very different now.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> That's a pretty vague assertion. Please define the model that you have
> in mind for D.
>
> OK. Don't follow the C++ model. But, then, what is the model that D
> follows? Is there any such model?

I was mainly referring to the fact that C++ succeeded in spite of having 
initially an incomplete specification. Nowadays the expectations are 
much higher.

Andrei