Official D Grammar

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-24 03:40, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> That would mean creating more keywords, which would break code. By using @, we
> avoid having to create new keywords, which I believe was the whole point in
> the first place. Which attributes got @ on them was fairly arbitrary, but they
> do definitely serve a purpose. And any new attributes in the future will
> probably have @ on them for the same reason.

You can't use the same reasoning anymore since we have UDA. Those will 
conflict with new keywords starting with an @.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg