Stable D version?

Dicebot m.strashun at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 03:03:41 PDT 2013


On Sunday, 28 April 2013 at 09:24:13 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
> I also think when modules are integrated into the C++ standard, 
> for most developers, there won't be any case left for D. Even 
> though D technically is superior in almost every way, 
> conservatism is strong enough.

C++ will never be sufficiently changed to leave no chance for 
other native languages. It is doomed because of mandatory 
backwards compatibility with huge legacy package. Main issues of 
C++ are not lack of advanced features but inconvenient design of 
basic features.

Well, D is trying to have its own share of those issues too :P


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list