1 matches bool, 2 matches long

[Walter Bright]

On 4/27/2013 5:53 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> which makes it so that you can define how a user-defined type will be treated
> when used in a condition and for built-in types completely removes if
> statements and loops from discussions on implicit conversion as there's no
> implicit conversion being used (unless you're arguing for the cast to not be
> inserted for conditions, in which case, implicit conversion _would_ be used).

I can't make heads or tails of this!