Official D Grammar

[Brian Schott]

On Friday, 26 April 2013 at 20:44:12 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that ANTRL is not up to the task either. 
> I've somehow managed to get the grammar to the point where it 
> correctly parses several phobos modules but takes a half hour 
> to do so.

I think I'm done with this grammar for now. If there's any 
interest, I can use it to create syntax diagrams for inclusion on 
dlang.org.

I'll also be filing a series of bug reports over the next few 
days. (Two recent examples: 0.0L is not valid according to the 
lexical standard, and deprecated("string") is not documented 
anywhere)