Official D Grammar

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 4/28/13 8:16 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Friday, 26 April 2013 at 20:44:12 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>> I'm beginning to think that ANTRL is not up to the task either. I've
>> somehow managed to get the grammar to the point where it correctly
>> parses several phobos modules but takes a half hour to do so.
>
> I think I'm done with this grammar for now. If there's any interest, I
> can use it to create syntax diagrams for inclusion on dlang.org.

Yes! This is awesome. Thanks for this work.

> I'll also be filing a series of bug reports over the next few days. (Two
> recent examples: 0.0L is not valid according to the lexical standard,
> and deprecated("string") is not documented anywhere)

Great.


Andrei