qtD

michaelc37 michaelc37 at msn.com
Thu Aug 1 07:22:13 PDT 2013


On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 17:55:50 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> Does it look as if the c++ side expects an extra field in the 
> beginning of the object?

Yes, I think that's what it looked like.
I'll try to re-run post some data results this weekend.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list