Template functions, can we make it more simple?

Dicebot public at dicebot.lv
Fri Aug 2 15:15:58 PDT 2013


On Friday, 2 August 2013 at 22:12:29 UTC, SteveGuo wrote:
>> void foo(int)
>> {}
>>
>> Is perfectly legal.
>
> We could change the language definition, make things like "void 
> foo(int) {}" illegal

No. Useless breaking change.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list