D component programming is a joke (Was: Re: Component programming)

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Aug 3 11:07:56 PDT 2013


On 8/3/2013 6:46 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> In this example, no, as all involved ranges are evaluated lazily. (I see your
> general point, though.)

The rules for ranges do not specify if they are done eagerly, lazily, or in 
parallel. Meaning, of course, that a library writer could provide all three 
forms and the user could select which one he wanted.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list