Future of string lambda functions/string predicate functions

[H. S. Teoh]

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:52:05AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 07:29:56 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Seems this thread has quietened down. So, what is the conclusion?
> > Seems like almost everyone concedes that silent deprecation is the
> > way to go.  We still support string lambdas in the background, but
> > in public docs we promote the use of the new lambda syntax. Would
> > that be a fair assessment of this discussion?
> 
> I find it interesting that very few Phobos devs have weighed in on the
> matter, but unfortunately, most of the posters who have weighed in do
> seem to be against keeping them.
[...]

Well, it would be nice of the rest of the Phobos devs speak up,
otherwise they are giving the wrong impression about the state of
things.


T

-- 
Many open minds should be closed for repairs. -- K5 user