UFCS for templates

[monarch_dodra]

On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:46:42 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:30:54 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:55:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> As always, providing motivating use case and advantage/cost 
>>>> comparison is usual requirement to make something happen.
>>>>
>>>> DIP's exist for a reason.
>>>
>>> Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
>>
>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 03:29:20 UTC, JS wrote:
>>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
> C'mon, guys, cool down. Both (or the three) of you are right.
>
> Some tend to forget that everybody here is a volunteer, so there
> is no such such thing as a duty. Others are enthusiastic and
> throw in ideas. People are of different kinds, sparks appear
> sometime.

That is *exactly* why a proposal should be backed with a use 
case. The people implementing them are *also* volunteers. Their 
time is just as valuable. Putting in personal effort reduces the 
burden of the implementors, and increases the chances of said 
proposal to go through (or at this point even be considered 
seriously).

Really, all I'm seeing is "I have this proposal; fuck you if you 
don't think it's good, I don't have any time to waste to explain 
it to you"... Well, in that case, OK. I don't have time to 
consider it either. Moving on.