A suggestion on keyword for_each

Tobias Pankrath tobias at pankrath.net
Fri Aug 9 08:20:35 PDT 2013


On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 14:51:05 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little 
wrote:
> Also, I don't particularly like for_reverse, since you can't 
> use a traditional for-loop syntax with for_reverse:
>
>     // would be syntax error
>     for_reverse (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {}

What do you think would be proper semantics for this?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list