Have Win DMD use gmake instead of a separate DMMake makefile?

[Brad Roberts]

On 8/10/13 10:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/10/2013 4:21 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 10, 2013 14:35:04 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Is this something that would be acceptable, or does building DMD for
>>> Windows need to stay as DM make?
>>
>> I don't see any problem with it, but that doesn't mean that Walter won't.
>
> Tools built for Unix never work right on Windows. It's why, for example, I run git on Linux and
> don't use the Windows badly ported versions of git. Tiresome problems revolve around failure to
> adapt to \ path separators, ; in PATH, CRLF line endings, Windows SEH, case insensitive file names,
> no symbolic links, etc., no Perl installed, etc.
>
> DMD and Phobos are fairly unusual in how well adapted they are to both Windows and Linux.

Gross over generalization when talking about _one_ app in _one_ scenario.  You're deflecting rather 
than being willing to discuss a topic that comes up regularly.  You are also well aware of just how 
often having multiple make files has cause pain by them not being updated in sync.

Does gmake have _any_ of those problems?