std.serialization: pre-voting review / discussion

[ilya-stromberg]

On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 at 09:28:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-08-14 11:25, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
>
>> I like this a lot more. Phobos just needs to be compatible 
>> with the
>> current release, so backwards compat is a non-issue here.
>
> I guess this is why we have this thread. I would like to hear 
> comments from a couple of others as well about this before 
> deciding.

I think we should avoid mixins as much as it possible.
UDA @nonSerialized looks much better, so I think we should use it.
Of course, we can leave template NonSerialized(Fields...) for 
backwards compatible with Orange and, maybe, deprecate it.