A Discussion of Tuple Syntax

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 01:50:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 00:38:31 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I think this whole thread is approaching things wrongly. It 
>> should be:
>>
>> 1. What do we need?

Also my answer to this question may probably be not very 
mainstream according to this thread :) I thing that most of all 
we need definition-driven tuple classification as opposed to 
current behavior-driven one (here is the built-in tuple and look 
what shiny stuff it can do).

Everything else is just a consequence.