Thoughts on possible tuple semantics

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 16:35:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 15:55:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> First, thank you so much ! The previous discussion was going 
>> nowhere as too much focused on syntax.
>
> Also what do you thing about core idea behind proposal - 
> defining
> strict type system relation that typeof(tuple(int.init)) ==
> ctseq(int)?

ctseq(int) should be the type of the unpacked tuple, to keep 
thing flowing with foo(T...)(T args);