Thoughts on possible tuple semantics

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 14:32:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Well, it falls into the same issue "named after what you can do 
> with it" vs "named after what it is". The very meaning of word 
> "alias" suggests that calling something "alias for X" is just 
> adding naming indirection on top of X ;)

That is what an alias parameter is, and I do think that regular 
alias and alias parameter should converge.