std.serialization: pre-voting review / discussion

[ilya-stromberg]

On Saturday, 24 August 2013 at 19:32:13 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-08-24 21:26, ilya-stromberg wrote:
>
>> In that case maybe we should remove "Serializable" interface? 
>> And just
>> spesify that user must implement "toData" or "fromData" for 
>> custom
>> serializing or deserializing. Is it possible?
>
> Yes, that's what I'm planning to do.

Maybe we should rename methods "toData" and "fromData" to avoid 
name collisions? For example, we can use serializeToData and 
deserializeFromData, it will be clearer.