param2 = param1

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Tue Aug 27 14:21:02 PDT 2013


On 8/27/2013 1:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I'd argue for it simply on the grounds that we try and be consistent, and
> having it work with function arguments and not template arguments is arbitrary
> and inconsistent. But other than that, I'm not sure that I care, as it's not
> something that I've ever needed to do with either function arguments or
> template arguments.

Above all, D needs to be useful. Implementing complex features that have no 
known purpose is counterproductive.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list