Build Master: Scheduling II

Andrew Edwards ridimz at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 3 17:32:49 PST 2013


On 12/3/13, 3:32 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 at 14:26:07 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
>>     Betas will be released four weeks after an official release. The
>> intent is to afford a thorough review of all features introduced since
>> the last official release and allot ample time to remedy any resulting
>> regressions.
>>
>>     Release candidates will follow naturally from Betas two weeks
>> prior to an official release. Once a release candidate is published,
>> no new features will be added.
>
> I don't understand the necessity of a beta release if it doesn't
> guarantee anything with respect to the codebase. Wouldn't it make more
> sense to have a "mid-release review" after 4 weeks where everyone
> discusses the state of the release and the targets for the release
> candidate? The release candidate seems to handle locking down the
> addition of new features.

The beta release will the signify the end of new features for that 
particular release cycle. I was concerned about the same thing after 
posting this morning but was on my way out the door so could not address 
earlier.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list