D vs Go in real life, part 2. Also, Erlang.

[Etienne]

On 2013-12-04 1:05 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 12:49:13 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> P.S. vibe.d is awesome, although I wish it'd compile with ldc or gdc
>
> What are the issues that are blocking you from using it with LDC? The
> 2.064 frontend not being officially yet? I couldn't find any mention of
> vibe.d in the open bugs on our GitHub tracker (besides #468, which
> concerns the unstable Win64 port). So even though I agree that vibe.d
> would be a very interesting target for LDC, there is little chance of
> the situation improving.
>
> David

I tried on linux x64 about 2 weeks ago and it's not vibe.d itself but 
the subpackages like vibelog, userman, or vibed.org, the issues were 
with std.range I think. I can start sending bug reports in, it would be 
great to see this working.