DIP 52 - Implicit conversions

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 12/12/13 17:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Great. I'm all for keeping it simple :o). Can you fix Kahan's example (or class
> of examples) with a glorious hack and call it a day?

FWIW: I intend to land the Imaginary type code I've been working on, but I'll 
have no problem if it gets rejected out of hand; it's been a worthwhile learning 
exercise.  OTOH, if I can be pointed to Kahan's example, I can also take a look 
at workarounds for that instead.