Inherent code performance advantages of D over C?
ed
sillymongrel at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 13:59:34 PST 2013
On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 09:01:17 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 02:12:00 UTC, ed wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 at 03:33:47 UTC, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>> The issue is convenience of writing C code in D vs C.
>>>>
>>>> So you're trying to say that it's easier to write C code in
>>>> D, rather
>>>> than in C?
>>>>
>>>> I thought this thread was about the inherent advantages of D
>>>> over C.
>>>
>>> I was referring specifically to Dicebot's post as ancestor:
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am finding C is much easier and more pleasant to write with
>> DMD.
>>
>> At work we're forced, under duress, to write C. I just got a
>> new project with a loose deadline so I thought I'd do a crazy
>> experiment to make it interesting...
>> (NOTE: I say "under duress" but I secretly like C/C++,
>> especially C++11/14.)
>>
>> I'm writing my C code with DMD. When tested and tweaked I do a
>> final compile with C compiler (test once more) then commit for
>> our QA to pick up. Occasionally I'll compile with the C
>> compiler to ensure I haven't leaked any D into the code and to
>> minimise the #include fixups at the end.
>>
>> Currently this is about 20 C-(D) files with approx.
>> 12,000-15,000 LOC. I doubt this workflow would scale much
>> further, although it doesn't look like becoming an issue yet.
>>
>> My experiment is a success IMO. My C code is much cleaner,
>> safer and more maintainable because of it. Yes, I know I could
>> write C like this without DMD ... but I'm lazy and fall back
>> into bad C habits :-)
>>
>> I now advocate that students should be taught C programming
>> with the DMD compiler :D
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ed
>
> Currently I always advocate that C and C++ development should
> always be done with warnings as errors enabled, coupled with
> static analyzers at very least during CI builds, breaking them
> if
> anything is found.
>
> Nice story though, thanks for sharing.
>
> --
> Paulo
I agree 100% and do so with my real D code also.
While it was a fun experiment I really don't believe think this
workflow could ever replace good static analysis tools.
Cheers,
Ed
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list