between and among: worth Phobosization?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/16/13 2:39 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 16/12/13 23:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I guess if we need several versions of between, we could give up on it.
>
> What's wrong with having it implemented analogous to std.random.uniform
> -- taking a bounds parameter which allows for open and/or closed at
> either end, with the default being "[)" ... ?

Too much sophistication for too trivial work. One between would be fine. 
Four would be probably overdoing it. So I'm retracting my proposal for 
between.

Andrei