DIP53 and DIP49 (ver2) - New definitions for qualified constructors and postblits

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 19 December 2013 at 15:32:33 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
> I think it is necessary small learning cost, to keep language 
> semantics
> simple.
>
> Kenji Hara

If that is an extra learning cost, doesn't it make the semantic 
more complex, almost by definition ?

I'm also against adding a new meaning to const, especially when 
its current meaning can make sense.