DIP53 and DIP49 (ver2) - New definitions for qualified constructors and postblits

[ilya-stromberg]

On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 09:18:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> On 20/12/13 10:10, ilya-stromberg wrote:
>> Would you like to be responsible for this decision?
>
> I hope it's clear that what I'm trying to do is understand your 
> reasoning, because you have ideas and knowledge that are 
> different from mine.

Yes, I know. The main question was: "is this example with 
advanced dynamic typing good enough and do you agree that REAL 
const-specific postblit/constructor can be useful?".