std.complex

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 26/11/13 17:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 11/26/13 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> So, as other people have suggested, really the only thing we can
>> reasonably do is to define a separate Imaginary type
>
> I agree. Let's move forward with this.

Provisional code:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1797

I also realized there was no explicit issue report, so created one:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11787