Updated DIP22 - Private symbol visibility

[Dicebot]

On Saturday, 21 December 2013 at 22:14:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> What? It's a major design win that we don't have to rerun 
> semantic for every identical instantiation, in the same sense 
> that we don't have to reinclude header files.

I know that and completely agree with that.

> Or are you only talking about access checks?

Yes.

> I don't think that handling access resolution separately from 
> look-up resolution is desirable.

That was my attitude initially when I have learned about this 
decision but it is root to certain class of problems in generic 
code and I have slowly moved to position that RAI for this 
exception is high enough.